If you're like me and it feels like you're looking for a jacket that may not exist, then take note: I wanted a Parka that was as warm as my best 800 fill technical puffy, waterproof and breathable, but looked like I bought it primarily cause it looked great with business casual to semi formal. You can find pieces of the afore described perfect jacket from NorthFace, Patagonia, Marmott, but not the whole Monty. Waterproof with synthetic down (never as warm or comfy no matter how much they use) or possibly 650 down fill (why must you skimp) but even then the style was usually wanting. Burton makes 2 jackets with 800 fill down and Gore-tex shell, but one was a standard parka with the ugly feaux fur, and looked like a standard LL Bean coat, the other was great but it totally looked like a snowboard jacket, which it was. Close but no cigar. I took a look at the Camosun because I never see Arc'teryx on sale, but the Camosun was on sale for exactly 3 days on Backcountry.com, and after hours of searching reviews for one person to say that it really wasn't all that warm...not one review used those sentiments, quite the opposite in fact.The sizing: I am 5'9 and 172lbs and can take a large in most jackets or a medium if they run slightly big. The medium fits perfect. I was a little concerned because most people say the jacket runs large, and the 6'1 model that weighs 180 was wearing a medium and it looked like it was all the way down to his wrists. Plus others reviews who were my height but 150 lbs and below said they had to go with the small. The medium fits me perfect, not long on the arms, perhaps because my shoulders are broad for my size. It has an athletic cut so its slightly form fitting which adds to the warmth trapping but perfect room for layering if you get the right size for you. The warmth: I read reviews raving about how super warm this jacket was to be such a lightweight. However, at 2lbs 3 oz, this jacket is on the light side of parkas but calling it lightweight is misleading. It feels super substantial and although the Burton AK L2 LZ Down jacket had 800 fill and felt slightly puffier and overall heavier, there is obviously something to the down mapping that Arc'teryx touts because this coat traps the heat like nothing I've felt before. Would I love for Arc'teryx to go all the way with this jacket and go with their 850 fill instead of the current 750? Absolutely, and I would without hesitation pay another $100 for that, but hey Arc'teryx isn't lying when they say its one of the warmest pieces they make. I haven't had it long enough to give temperature ratings but based on my initial wearing, I'm thinking I'll be fine with a short sleeve polo down to 20 F or lower before layering and I run naturally cold. I was able to find the total volume of down in my quest for information on its warmth, its 105 grams, and that's total grams not g/meter squared. The product expert at Arc'teryx said the Therme Parka has 120 grams and is a little warmer. Perhaps because its a little longer? If there's no reason then why did they supposedly improve on this product from the Therme Parka and make it less plush/warm? In conclusion, the Camosun looks incredible with jeans to business attire, even the embroidered symbol on the left shoulder looks classy. Its warmth is second to none of any jacket I've ever experienced, outside of a high end expedition type Parka. As others have said it has a standard oversized hood that I'm guessing could fit over a helmet should you ever need it, wish they would develop an urban hood that was smaller. The hood uses coreloft as the head is prone to sweat and it retains heat when wet, but as an urban piece I'd prefer true down and a bit more insulation in the hood. BUT, other than those small wish items this jacket is PERFECT!
Karsten S., backcountry.com
November 27, 2016